|
as per the nameclaim half of the game having the names of their own makes it hard for scum to roll with that we would have a lot of potential 1-1 lynches, could coordinate our night actions more, and would probably win in a landslide (but that's reason to lynch me, right?) if it's reason for dissent, it probably came from mafia, or people who didn't understand what i was suggesting
|
when i say half of the game having names of their own, i mean to say half of the game are town power roles
if you are not green, and not mafia, you are a power role, right? i guess not all 16 have to be in the game...
anyways, im going to officially claim that i am not a townie
|
if we put out cards on the table, it would be like being at 170 supply vs 70 instead of our units shooting one another we potentially have more kp than the mafia, and batman might help us nab hugo massclaiming is a good idea, even if i originally just meant nameclaiming, i'm starting to believe
*dont stop.. believin'*
|
On February 08 2012 02:13 Tunkeg wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 01:59 Bill Murray wrote: when i say half of the game having names of their own, i mean to say half of the game are town power roles
if you are not green, and not mafia, you are a power role, right? i guess not all 16 have to be in the game...
anyways, im going to officially claim that i am not a townie WTF do you want to achieve by this? If you aren't scum you got a big crosshair on you, and if you aren't third party you will soon enough die at night. I can not see a scenario where this will benefit town. More so we as a town don't get any smarter by this, you aren't confirmed in any way you just confuse us by doing so. hahaha, tunkeg, my boy, sit down and watch the pro at work
there is this thing called having your medics protect different people (like me!) there is a thing called coordinating your vigilantes so they dont hit the same people there is a thing called a detective check
if we massclaim (and im trying to get you all to see we should) we actually will have more KP than the mafia, + lynch and batman... how is that bad?
i ALREADY have a giant crosshair on me, furthermore. I would be killed off just as easily as someone like Radfield, due to my scumhunting prowess later in the game via votecounting analysis.
|
since this got pushed off the page so fast
I AM A POWER ROLE
|
quit fishing, toadesstern, and your mocking makes you look ugly
on page 13 @ico, I suggested a mass nameclaim, truly, not a massclaim in that sense I wanted to do so only because Kenpachi claimed that way
I completely support a policy lynch on him to get him to quit claiming townie like that. I used to do that, and it is in no way helpful. You can do it as the GF as easily as you can being really townie.
If we're not policy lynching him RIGHT NOW, I'm not going to be voting him again for the duration of the game.
On February 06 2012 20:19 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 19:25 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Do you want Batman shooting at people he thinks are blue, or people he thinks are scum? That is why we should give up the Joker. well but shooting scummy people is way harder than shooting townies. I guess batman will try and go for scum first, probably just shoot into scummy players or DT into them. If he hits his target, fine, if he did not there's one less scummy target and that one might still end up being joker. After he killed his mafia target he can still just blindly rampage town or DT because it should be way easier to figure out town and one of them is bound to be the joker. Obviously he only has to make sure that no side wins before he wins and he has to make sure not to get lynched. He's pretty much immortal so time is running in his favor as long as he's not lynched because both town and mafia are helping him shooting each other. Oh and obviously BM's massclaim (or anyone else saying we should do that) is bullshit. If we were to do that there'd be a shitload of lies and fakeclaims. VT's claiming blue to get shot instead of blues, blues trying not to get shot, reds trying to look townie and so on. I don't know about you guys but I'm pretty sure mafia is having an easier time figuring shit out than everyone else will have on their OWN. Not to mention that there's not even a need to figure this out unless you're batman catwoman or a medic. There's just no point in there. I'm totally fine with "knowing" someone is probably a townie, I don't need to know his role. That's how I see it: 0 benefits, maybe a little wifom to screw with mafia but huge drawbacks. I disagree, but I was really just wanting to nameclaim moreso with that, than actual massclaiming of roles. If we did massclaim, however, we as a town can hold people accountable for their night actions
I do not like adam's play this game. I buddied the shit out of him last game as scum. However, this game, he feels more uneasy, given into should be's as opposed to what ares. I don't like his jaybundrage vote. 13 pages in, and he's voting for someone who hasn't posted? That's WORSE than a policy vote in the RVS. Adam votes for a guy with 0 tells after he calls out 3 people for doing things he doesn't like. That is a huge contradiction. Where is his Kurumi vote? He makes a good case on him via meta, only to back off and vote on a null reason (the guy HASNT EVEN POSTED).....
##vote: adam4167
On February 06 2012 22:01 ico wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 21:45 Adam4167 wrote: All this setup piffle is useless and counterproductive. Both sides can post filler about the setup. Let power roles make their own judgement calls, let the night actions unfold as they do, and spend your time doing something that will actually lead to scum kills, like prodding people or reading filters. In the spirit of that:
Kurumi, you soft-defend Schworz twice in a single post, also indicate that vigi's should avoid him and the rest of your post is basic setup waffle. I don't remember you being this wishy-washy in TL50 either, with statements like 'I find it funny that...' and 'I just ponder', you sure come off that way now. What are you playing at?
Tobberoth, you say you're considering a vote on Kenpachi, yet you want to wait until 'discussion comes up later in the day'. This comes off as quite passive and almost like you're waiting for a bandwagon to pickup speed before you seal the deal. Why not just vote him now if you find him suspicious, as you claim, then move it later as more information presents itself?
Ico, policy lynches are retarded... just no.
Jaybrundage, I know you haven't even posted yet, but we've never been the same team. Don't see why this game would be any different. Have my vote!
##Vote: jaybrundage And we have another herp derp poster. You are making your own case. Only scum knows whether someone is on their team by now. So you are either scum or stupid townie. In each case you are a threat to town. yeah, i agree with this. ico, since we're "on the same wavelength" regarding this post, who else do you suspect?
On February 06 2012 22:14 Adam4167 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 22:01 ico wrote: And we have another herp derp poster. You are making your own case. Only scum knows whether someone is on their team by now. So you are either scum or stupid townie. In each case you are a threat to town. You sir, are already posting garbage, that's 2 for 2. I clearly have no idea what team he is on, nor was my vote serious in any capacity. We here to lynch scum, not 'stupid' townies. your non serious vote on someone with 0 posts came after a post detailing why 3 or 4 people had done suspicious shit. that is a contradiction.
On February 06 2012 22:14 DoctorHelvetica wrote:You didn't mention the joker claim in "my way" you just said batman should shoot the first few days which is completely anti-town as it is. Your plan is anti-town but you're not willing to commit to it, that's why I'm voting for you. I don't even have a plan I'm just pointing out the flaws in Cyber_Cheese's grand scheme. If Batman has any sense and other people have already pointed out that it makes even less sense for him to use his KP earlier than later. Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 22:01 ico wrote:On February 06 2012 21:45 Adam4167 wrote: All this setup piffle is useless and counterproductive. Both sides can post filler about the setup. Let power roles make their own judgement calls, let the night actions unfold as they do, and spend your time doing something that will actually lead to scum kills, like prodding people or reading filters. In the spirit of that:
Kurumi, you soft-defend Schworz twice in a single post, also indicate that vigi's should avoid him and the rest of your post is basic setup waffle. I don't remember you being this wishy-washy in TL50 either, with statements like 'I find it funny that...' and 'I just ponder', you sure come off that way now. What are you playing at?
Tobberoth, you say you're considering a vote on Kenpachi, yet you want to wait until 'discussion comes up later in the day'. This comes off as quite passive and almost like you're waiting for a bandwagon to pickup speed before you seal the deal. Why not just vote him now if you find him suspicious, as you claim, then move it later as more information presents itself?
Ico, policy lynches are retarded... just no.
Jaybrundage, I know you haven't even posted yet, but we've never been the same team. Don't see why this game would be any different. Have my vote!
##Vote: jaybrundage And we have another herp derp poster. You are making your own case. Only scum knows whether someone is on their team by now. So you are either scum or stupid townie. In each case you are a threat to town. I don't know if this is OMGUS or a horrible horrible misunderstanding of what Adam posted. Hopefully it's not a language barrier issue. He didn't seriously claim he knows what team anyone is on, he's using the random vote which is viable this early in the game and making a lighthearted joke about it. That's really not scummy. It TRULY IS SCUMMY because he had non RVS reasoning on other players - hence he was just FoSing his scumbuddy (say, he is coaching someone - I'm thinking Kurumi - to not act a certain way), and then voting a townie who is "lurking" (really not even acknowledging the thread), and likely to be modkilled.
it's a VERY anti town move, a contradiction, and my meta of him (i buddied him when I was scum and he was town in L) says, as town, he doesn't post like this. I'll see how my read progresses over the larger portion of the game, however, but right now i'm not backing off of this.
On February 06 2012 22:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 22:34 ico wrote:On February 06 2012 22:14 Adam4167 wrote: I clearly have no idea what team he is on, nor was my vote serious in any capacity.
We here to lynch scum, not 'stupid' townies. On February 06 2012 22:14 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I don't know if this is OMGUS or a horrible horrible misunderstanding of what Adam posted. Hopefully it's not a language barrier issue. He didn't seriously claim he knows what team anyone is on, he's using the random vote which is viable this early in the game and making a lighthearted joke about it. That's really not scummy. It is way to early in day 1 to go for a random vote. The person Adam votes for has not even posted in the thread yet. I'd not care so much about it if it was close to the posting and voting deadline, which makes a random vote excusable, but still not desired. Please note I have not put my vote on him yet, about ten people haven't even posted and day 1 still lasts for quite a while. But I am seriously irritated by the fact that actions like day1 townclaim or early day 1 random votes are done at all and get defended by other posters. Yeah, it's pretty normal in fact I think at mafiascum town usually even declares a random voting stage and they are much better players than TL players so I don't see what you're getting at they are in no way "much better players than TL players" I really hope you trust me on that one they're typically 15 year old kids who rage
TL is filled with amazing scumhunters
I was just vibing Kurumi as a 3rd party, and then he post this:
On February 06 2012 22:47 Kurumi wrote: Also why are we discussing 3rd party strategy, besides giving them advice and generating void discussion because not much can be analysed from that. They play for themselves and were here to win as whole: town. When I get home I will try to compose some lists, maybe even graphs. yeah, he's batman/catwoman calling it now
On February 06 2012 22:47 ico wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 22:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Yeah, it's pretty normal in fact I think at mafiascum town usually even declares a random voting stage and they are much better players than TL players so I don't see what you're getting at I am aware of that and there is a distinction between having a random voting stage and just randomly voting in a situation that doesn't force it. But we should probably have any further discussion about that after this game, it is derailing. the town being generically better in MS is due to how bad the scumplay there is People on TL have to truly scumhunt good players
The RVS is so useless when you have actual reasoning, like adam had IN-THE-POST he cast an rvs vote.
On February 06 2012 22:47 Adam4167 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 22:34 ico wrote:
It is way to early in day 1 to go for a random vote. The person Adam votes for has not even posted in the thread yet. I'd not care so much about it if it was close to the posting and voting deadline, which makes a random vote excusable, but still not desired. Please note I have not put my vote on him yet, about ten people haven't even posted and day 1 still lasts for quite a while.
But I am seriously irritated by the fact that actions like day1 townclaim or early day 1 random votes are done at all and get defended by other posters. Day 1 town claims should be considered null. They're complete fluff and should have zero impact on your decision to vote someone. We are in the 'RVS' or Random Voting Stage. Its perfectly acceptable to randomly vote someone to generate discussion. Hey look, its working right now! I am however interested in why you're taking such great offense to my (and Kenpachis) actions. You're making these actions out to be much worse then they actually are. defends someone claiming green, that helps scum narrow the list down defends his rvs vote, when he had good, legitimate reasoning in his posts on kurumi, among others says he's "just generating discussion" - woudn't your real vote on kurumi with real reasoning have been better? Was my vote on Kenpachi "RVS"? Did I not have 3-4 good points, in terms of scenarios, of how his action was anti-town regardless of what his alignment was?
On February 06 2012 23:01 Palmar wrote: lol mafiascum towns are terrible, the random voting stage is part of why they're terrible. this. the other part of why you think they're good, like i said, to reiterate, is because the scum play there is NOT up to snuff with TL
On February 06 2012 23:15 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 23:06 Jackal58 wrote: Palmar - You scum this game? Tell the truth. Sup Jackal, Kenpachi scum this game? Bets on Opz being 3rd party? ok, new read, same as the old read kurumi isnt batman/catwoman kurumi is scum with kenpachi, adam, sheth, tunkeg
On February 07 2012 00:28 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 23:46 Kurumi wrote:On February 06 2012 23:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 06 2012 22:47 Kurumi wrote: Also why are we discussing 3rd party strategy, besides giving them advice and generating void discussion because not much can be analysed from that. They play for themselves and were here to win as whole: town. When I get home I will try to compose some lists, maybe even graphs. Best way to get the day 1 discussion rolling besides elections/rvs/clues You think you can't get any reads based off of peoples reactions to what has been discussed? I said not much. If there was normal serial killer in play, would You discuss something about him besides his existence ? It's good for day 1. There has been a "town" plan to have the joker sacrifice himself day 1 when it's obvious Batman would just use his DT power unless he's an idiot. That's good enough for me. I'm done talking about that joke of a plan. If it is a scum proposal, they're gonna ditch it and move on to something else probably an easy lynch like rg or kenpachi speaking of "easy" outs, you just named 2 easy outs I've yet to see any actual reads from you, you're just bantering about the setup. @end of 16
kita, i am dreadfully serious about a massclaim imagine we have a ball of marines and medics, and our units are shooting themselves we have 2-4 medics, potentially like 4-6 vigs 3 dts 4 veterans
we have like 5 kp as a town per round minimum batman potentially will help us out, too
On February 07 2012 04:31 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2012 04:29 layabout wrote:On February 07 2012 04:27 rgTheSchworz wrote:On February 06 2012 18:41 Kenpachi wrote:On February 06 2012 16:50 rgTheSchworz wrote: Way to go claiming Joker. Don't do that. We lose one vig for .,.... nothing, cuz Batman is helping us regardless of the situation. And his task isn't to shoot scum, it's to shoot 1 particular scum. He won't risk giving off info for the sake of helping town, he's 3rd party after all and only cares for his win. It's likely he'll DT ppl till he finds Hugo.And he can't hint at being batman at all.
Anyone who claims being town or any blue D1 should be considered for a lynch.It's stupid,useless,and full of WIFOM-Helps scum a ton.
For the lack of a proper Random Voting Stage, I vote Kenpachi.
Considering the current situation, it's justified and if it goes through, we'll have info at least. There's no mayoral elections so setup chat and strategies shouldn't make scum stick out too much in the thread. This, instead will.
I feel Day 1 someone always gets lynched for beingcarelessandthat someone is almost always a townie.So, it doesn't do any harm at all to ramp the pressure now instead of later in the day when we will be hard-pressed for time and are likely to make hasty decisions. This post is an atrocity. RANDOM VOTING STAGE? REALLY? fucking dumb. Its detrimental to blow any KP you get for mere information.[Fun Fact: Town loses when i get lynched. (100% of the time) Oh and im not hinting anytihng. i shouldn't give a vibe when i claim townie. Ive claimed townie when i was Mafia, Veteran, Vigilante, Doctor and etc. From my standpoint, i have no opinion on Sheth, however im now deadset on this fool . Ooh, this is what I was looking for. OMGUS+Saying that he claiming town doesn't mean anything. Then why do you claim town? To look interesting? I'm not yet advocating blowing any lynches not KP, cuz KP are scum's property right?Very minor scumslip here. You get all jittery and angry when I vote you. FoS : KenpachiAlso ##UnvoteGuess it was random after all, contrary to what some believe. RVS over. I'll look into ppl's responses to my posts and analyze them.Point was and still is to get ppl off setup talking. Posting analysis as I go. May double or triple post have fun going through all of his posts. maybe you should read through some of his old games and then come back and apologise for wasting our time. All Your posts are utter garbage. Do I need to motivate You with a vote to help Town? Oh wait, maybe You don't want to help us? Why are You defending Kenpachi? hmmm... maybe i was wrong about kurumi
On February 07 2012 06:09 Liquid`Sheth wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2012 05:51 Jackal58 wrote:On February 07 2012 05:42 Jackal58 wrote:On February 07 2012 05:29 Kurumi wrote:So Jackal, what direction should we go now? I think Radfield needs some poking. On February 07 2012 05:29 Jayjay54 wrote:On February 07 2012 04:56 Jackal58 wrote: Good job Kurumi. You've successfully identified two trolls a noob and a cowboy. Now what? jackal my man, how are things? I trust your opinion since my first game. mind to state your opinion on: Schworz jaybrundage VE? I'll join the fun, if you are ready! I'm not getting excited about anything until we hit the 24 hour mark. There are a few folks that have confirmed receiving their roles but have posted nothing else yet. There are also a fair few folks I haven't played with before so I'm trying to get an idea of what their posting style is. Conversely they haven't played with me either so I fully expect some of them to call me scum before the end of day 1. I can answer that now. Pffffttttt. I don't care. I believe Radfield confirmed but nothing else. But it may have been Refallen. I gotta go back and look again. If VE is scum he'll scream "lynch me" by day 2. At least he does when he's on a team with me. Maybe I just have that effect on people. rgtheschwartz and Jayb I have no clue. Ebwop - It is risk.nuke that posted "confirm" and then nothing else. If he remains afk for 24 hours I'd have no problem killing him. So, you're a fan of lynching lurkers? Or is this purely based on his meta? I really dislike going off of purely meta. And just the statement here bothers me. If he remains afk for half our day then he wants to kill him. Waiting 24 more hours and if he doesn't post having him modkilled should be the best idea. Especially because if we pressure the lurker and he never posts well we've lost a lot of information we could have gained going on someone else. I learned this because of Intrigue. Thanks Intrigue. -.- im starting to like sheth's play again i'm having a loss really finding scum this game i agree with the above post about letting people be modkilled if need be... no point voting someone when we can potentially get 2 reds for the price of 1, and if he's town we're going to lose him anyways. we're capable of scumhunting, and it will only lead to more solid voting analysis in the future.
On February 07 2012 07:19 layabout wrote:glad you asked: the names above the key are there because there was no room below the key. that picture will become my primary tool for scumhunting in this and quite likely furture games. it is similar in essence to a Nisani "node graph" but is better because it is in paint. You also prompted me to add a new section for those players that i just cannot read I present Arkham city V 2.0.1.png: + Show Spoiler + hahahahahaha hahahahahhahahahaahaahahahahhahhahahahahahahahahahja vsdfjslna oh, you so funny!
On February 07 2012 07:47 Kenpachi wrote: This town is full of fail.
On February 07 2012 07:48 Kurumi wrote:LET ME NOT HELP IT OH WAIT I AM JUST FULFILLING MY WIN CONDITION :p
On February 07 2012 08:00 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 19:08 Bill Murray wrote: So, Kenpachi is retracting his townie claim? Great!
1) kenpachi is lying - not protown 2) kenpachi isn't lying and is expendable (he's just a townie) - not protown to out d1, better than lynching a detective 3) kenpachi is mafia - not protown
I'm leaning towards 3 due to his paper-thin counter vote on rgtheschworz with 0 reasoning other than LOL I CAUGHT U IT WAS A TARP!!!!!!!!1!. I was leaning town on him until that action. There isn't a whole lot to go on, so far, so this is still definitely only semi-serious...
Another reason for this vote is so that we don't out a blue role. Let's go ahead and chalk up some hypocrisy, wifom, and omgus in his play as well...
holy non-rvs vote, batman ##vote: kenpachi What the hell is this well, i'll tell ya what is isn't: A SOFTCLAIM
On February 07 2012 10:43 Radfield wrote:+ Show Spoiler +My self imposed vow of silence is now over OK Sheth, that's all fine and dandy, but who do you want to lynch and why? Also, I enjoyed your streaming this afternoon Palmar: Toad, VE, Kitaman, what are your thoughts on them. I don't think VE is a great lynch today. His scum play is fairly transparent(no offense meant VE ), and his town play is pretty straight forward. Lynching him Day 1 is not optimal. In resistance he was fairly obviously town by Day 2, and in XLVIII he was mostly exposed scum by late Day 2. No rush. Bill, where did you go? Still think Kenpachi is our best Day 1 lynch? You have to admit it's a bit ironic that you called him out for claiming green.... when it's something you've most certainly done before on Day 1. CyberCheese, now that you've successfully deduced the best plan forward for the third party situation, who would you like to lynch? LOL thank god someone is finally confirmed town to me... but it's radfield... the master of disguise..... jeez
I was really wanting someone to find that hypocrisy
cheers
-- i'm stopping on page 22, i will put more work in later
|
I am not quite sure what I can claim and not be modkilled I dont want to be modkilled and not help the town Im not claiming 3rd party, im a town PR
|
|
has anyone talked about the gay phone network, yet?
|
toad... 7 vigs... 2 can be medics.... lets do the math lol
|
On February 08 2012 02:57 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 02:53 Bill Murray wrote: has anyone talked about the gay phone network, yet? wtf is this shit? there is a gigantic mason network im a part of that is why i'm claiming a power role i know a confirmed town, as well
|
tunkeg/chaoser please stop
|
On February 08 2012 03:10 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 03:09 Bill Murray wrote:On February 08 2012 02:57 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 08 2012 02:53 Bill Murray wrote: has anyone talked about the gay phone network, yet? wtf is this shit? there is a gigantic mason network im a part of that is why i'm claiming a power rolei know a confirmed town, as well you're insane. excuse me? BC, I do not enjoy direct insults, such as this one
|
On February 08 2012 03:12 Jayjay54 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 03:09 Bill Murray wrote:On February 08 2012 02:57 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 08 2012 02:53 Bill Murray wrote: has anyone talked about the gay phone network, yet? wtf is this shit? there is a gigantic mason network im a part of that is why i'm claiming a power rolei know a confirmed town, as well wait what? so you are masoning? with who? and why does this paint you town? No, i was masoned. It doesn't paint me town whatsoever - but I ask you - why would i do this as scum? I am going to ask BC to what extent I can claim in thread, because I know a confirmed town via the network, and someone speculating about roles in relation to who would have sent said network's alignment in relation to the video game with which this came from.
Considering this isn't a bastard game, the flavor of the NEIGHBOR network (it's not a mason network - we don't know everyone is town) points towards the person having sent it being town. If he's town, and I'm outting in the thread saying I have a confirmed town, how is this anti-town?
|
On February 08 2012 03:12 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 03:08 Bill Murray wrote: toad... 7 vigs... 2 can be medics.... lets do the math lol the point I am 'wating' about is the bolded part. 5 "KP" or whatever you want to call townvig-shots PER CYCLE? As far as I know TL only plays with 1-shot vigs but you make it look like we got vigs with more than 1 shot. Why do you think so? oh i just assumed that if you're correct, i feel i've made a mistake pushing the massclaim however, given my role, i know that the flavor of this game is definitely unique.
my role cannot die n1, for instance, and i am not a veteran
|
On February 08 2012 03:21 Jayjay54 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 03:15 Bill Murray wrote:On February 08 2012 03:12 Jayjay54 wrote:On February 08 2012 03:09 Bill Murray wrote:On February 08 2012 02:57 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 08 2012 02:53 Bill Murray wrote: has anyone talked about the gay phone network, yet? wtf is this shit? there is a gigantic mason network im a part of that is why i'm claiming a power rolei know a confirmed town, as well wait what? so you are masoning? with who? and why does this paint you town? No, i was masoned. It doesn't paint me town whatsoever - but I ask you - why would i do this as scum? I am going to ask BC to what extent I can claim in thread, because I know a confirmed town via the network, and someone speculating about roles in relation to who would have sent said network's alignment in relation to the video game with which this came from. Considering this isn't a bastard game, the flavor of the NEIGHBOR network (it's not a mason network - we don't know everyone is town) points towards the person having sent it being town. If he's town, and I'm outting in the thread saying I have a confirmed town, how is this anti-town? woah slow down. a) how many people are in that network? who is? and how long has this been going on. b) if you are masoned and claim this still doesn't make you town whatsoever. Your mason buddy might be scum (even though you say it's unlikely). Even if he is town and masons you, you still could claim to get easy towncreds. Sorry, I don't get your allignment from claiming being masoned. a. quit fishing b. no, unless bc is a bastard mod, the one person who initiated the neighbor network is town via flavor
like i said, we can't afford for my role to die n1 due to flavor, and im not a veteran, so i need a medic on me
|
On February 08 2012 03:21 Katina wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 03:13 Bill Murray wrote:On February 08 2012 03:10 Palmar wrote:On February 08 2012 03:09 Bill Murray wrote:On February 08 2012 02:57 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 08 2012 02:53 Bill Murray wrote: has anyone talked about the gay phone network, yet? wtf is this shit? there is a gigantic mason network im a part of that is why i'm claiming a power rolei know a confirmed town, as well you're insane. excuse me? BC, I do not enjoy direct insults, such as this one If there was a like button, I would like this post.... thanks.
|
On February 08 2012 03:27 Jayjay54 wrote: also BM, what are you trying to achieve with the mason claim. all you do is generate pointless discussions. As long as you don't provide logs, which help us, there's like no benefit at all.
and you say yourself your mass claim was based on wrong facts.
I know a little BM right now, but this is getting dangerously nonsense-like first off, how is this nonsensical? explain second off, how is a private network of neighbors we can use to coordinate a negative thing? why should i out the chat logs? i see no point in it.
pointless discussion? have you read the 20 pages on 3rd party speculation?
|
On February 08 2012 03:29 Jayjay54 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2012 03:26 Bill Murray wrote:On February 08 2012 03:21 Jayjay54 wrote:On February 08 2012 03:15 Bill Murray wrote:On February 08 2012 03:12 Jayjay54 wrote:On February 08 2012 03:09 Bill Murray wrote:On February 08 2012 02:57 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 08 2012 02:53 Bill Murray wrote: has anyone talked about the gay phone network, yet? wtf is this shit? there is a gigantic mason network im a part of that is why i'm claiming a power rolei know a confirmed town, as well wait what? so you are masoning? with who? and why does this paint you town? No, i was masoned. It doesn't paint me town whatsoever - but I ask you - why would i do this as scum? I am going to ask BC to what extent I can claim in thread, because I know a confirmed town via the network, and someone speculating about roles in relation to who would have sent said network's alignment in relation to the video game with which this came from. Considering this isn't a bastard game, the flavor of the NEIGHBOR network (it's not a mason network - we don't know everyone is town) points towards the person having sent it being town. If he's town, and I'm outting in the thread saying I have a confirmed town, how is this anti-town? woah slow down. a) how many people are in that network? who is? and how long has this been going on. b) if you are masoned and claim this still doesn't make you town whatsoever. Your mason buddy might be scum (even though you say it's unlikely). Even if he is town and masons you, you still could claim to get easy towncreds. Sorry, I don't get your allignment from claiming being masoned. a. quit fishing b. no, unless bc is a bastard mod, the one person who initiated the neighbor network is town via flavor like i said, we can't afford for my role to die n1 due to flavor, and im not a veteran, so i need a medic on me a. yeah, please don't help town by providing information. b. what? I seriously tried to understand that, but I failed. a. i have outted my role, as a mouth of the network, so i can be protected - how is that not 100% info i know? b. the role with which the neighbor came from is confirmed town
|
On February 08 2012 03:30 Tobberoth wrote: Sorry for pulling a n00b card again, but what is this mason discussion?
From what I gathered on google, mason is a flavor thing which allows some players to have secret meetings during night... how can this happen in this game when PMs aren't allowed and there's no role with that power? Or has the power roles gotten information not available in the OP? you mean neighbor
|
|
|
|