lol i didnt even notice that ;_;
TL Mafia L - Page 3
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
lol i didnt even notice that ;_; | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
Damn, now I'm regretting voting for him... | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 15 2012 12:20 supersoft wrote: i don't want to recount the votes. I am just hoping :D I find it funner not to :D | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 15 2012 12:29 Palmar wrote: I'm watching Tim Tebow fail, it's hilarious. Tim Tebow is the man (giants fan) | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
As for other candidates, I'm not at all on board with protact or sandroba, I'm reasonably certain they are not scum. I'd say protact is more scummier so if anyone was goin to die if someone can prove a bus, then it would be him. Obviously, no one has given solid proof as to why ciryandor was a failed bus. Seems like logical failures, since palmar was town, why would scum fail push protact and crew, and then watch ciryandor actually get vig'd? Sounds more like he is town and in the pool of people who correctly agreed with him, there was a vig. Macpo seems very similar to ciryandor. Very self-centered posting. And... On January 17 2012 11:15 Foolishness wrote: Pretty interesting how you just mentioned Macpo now and decided to (almost) ignore him completely from the start of the game. In fact I find it very very very interesting that you make a lot of posts like these... ...while choosing to ignore a lynch candidate who is under attack from arguably the 2 best scumhunters in this game. Hey Incog, I found another mafia! Bingo. Through day 1, when people were going on about being distracted, I started thinking on people who were abusing this to no end, getting their fingers in every pie, and takng zero risk in putting themselves out there. On January 13 2012 18:02 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: I was debating what to do with my 3k but I couldn’t think up of anything fast enough so this is it Anyway, I am running for mayor as well. At the moment, I do not most of the mayor candidates. I don’t like Cyber_Cheese because his reasoning for him being mayor is weak in my opinion. Saying that you should be elected because your scum play is bad isn’t very inspiring. His other argument is that he’ll be active (nice trait for a mayor to have but everybody should be active), also he says he’ll lynch the scummiest mayor candidate which I don’t like because one of the mayor candidates may not be the best choice. I don’t like Kitaman because he says he’s not the strongest town player and I want to elect the strongest mayor possible. He also cites his activity as a reason to be elected but like I said earlier, everyone should be active. Kita does say some good things, if the people who I consider stronger players than kita don’t run or look scummy to me, I’d not be opposed to having kita as my sheriff. Bum is a really bad vote. Insane 2 is a good example, another good example is responsibility where kita (the mafia) almost convinced him to mislynch. My point is that bum can be swayed and isn’t the most reliable person to have for mayor. I want a mayor who I can be sure will not be swayed by mafia. Also, I really dislike bum claiming (or at least hinting) blue. I don’t like Mr. Wiggles, his reasoning is basically, “every mayor post will sound the same so vote for me.” While it’s true that mayor posts do sound similar, they put the candidate in the spotlight, and even if the candidate doesn’t get elected, they still have to play by the values they espoused because they publicly said that’s how they’d play. Just because Foolishness is good does not make Bill Murray a good vote. While foolishness is known for random trolling in the first few days, this is just completely ridiculous. While it’s great that BM says he wants to scum hunt and all, I want to elect someone who I’ve seen evidence of good scum hunting and I haven’t seen that from BM (in fairness, I didn’t have the greatest opportunity, however I’m still going to stick with players I know are good). Risk.nuke does the same thing as kita and says he isn’t the best townie, he also says he’s lost interest a few times but swears he won’t do it this game. Famous last words… No offense risk but this isn’t very compelling. Protactinium has one post saying he’ll lynch ciryandor. Not very compelling, maybe that’ll change when he posts more. Out of all the candidates so far, BloodyC0bbler is the one who made the most sense and I would vote for to be my sheriff. He and Bum are both claiming to do a lot of the same thing, however bum (as I said before) can be swayed and manipulated. BC also willing accepts the spotlight which is good and he doesn’t over promise what he can deliver. Bum talks about organizing the town, BC says what he’d do. Subtle but important difference which means without further ado: ##Vote: BloodyC0bbler I’d love to have you be my sheriff :D Now after all that let’s get to why I would make a good mayor. For one thing, I am a good scum hunter. I can claim credit for at least two scum lynches and two successful vigi shots in a recent time frame. My town play is extremely solid and you can count on me to be analyzing and posting throughout the game. While I hate to use this as a reason since I ragged on people earlier for doing it, I’d also like to point out that my scum play is pretty atrocious as evidenced by my performance in the last pyp game. As mayor, I will be constantly scum hunting. Now mayor doesn’t magically give a license to scum hunt, I'll be owning scum hard whether I'm elected or not, it’s the protection I’m looking for. I would like to be able to kill as many scum as possible and that’ll be difficult if I die night one. Electing a mayor is a lot about choosing who will survive the nights, that’s why it’s important to have a townie AND a good player because the longer that player can survive the better. This is why a) I don’t want to vote for people who consider themselves only middling town player and b) why I want BC to be sheriff. Anyway, those are my reasons for getting elected, now on to scum hunting. I’d like everyone to take a quick look at these posts by GGQ: These two posts are extremely bad for town. The first one is bad because he just calls out these people without giving a reason for why their posts were bad. If you’re going to call people out (as I’m doing right now) say why you’re doing it. In fact I’d like to make that clear real quick: If you are town, give reasons when you call people out. There’s absolutely no reason not to share your thoughts. The second post is bad because it contradicts itself and is pretty useless all in all. Nisani does the same thing: Although Nisani later clarifies this post as to why he doesn’t like the candidates, it would have been way better if he had just done that in the first place rather than make a blanket statement. Please please please refrain from making these sorts of posts. If you’re gonna say something is bad, tell us why. This goes for everyone and it’d be great if we had a game where everyone explained stuff when they posted it. Also while we’re on the topic of bad posting, please keep these sorts of questions (@such and such, who do you think about so and so?) to a minimum. They serve no purpose. Questions are powerful tools when used correctly; however mindlessly asking people random questions is a great way for scum to appear active and contributing. So let’s as a town just agree not to do this mkay. I don’t have much else to say at the moment. In anticipation of all the “@Mayor candidate: who would you lynch and why?” posts I’ll just say at the moment I’d lynch GGQ based on what I wrote above, however it’s only like a few hours into the game and not everybody has even checked in yet so I think it’s too early start calling for people’s deaths. However, now is a perfect time for: FOS: GGQ Gonna match actions to words. K I’m going to sleep. I’ll be around tomorrow so I’ll address whatever comes up then. Reading this again, I can't really find a bigger offender of this then meapak. Especially for a vet, he hits all the safe keys (dropping down his vote and his suspicions). I'll bold more examples of "safe keys". + Show Spoiler + On January 14 2012 05:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Wow lots happened while I was asleep Alright let's talk BC's claim. BC's claim is actually pretty brilliant in my eye and here's why. Before claiming, BC was easily one of the top three candidates for mayor if not the top one. There's little doubt in my mind that BC would have gotten one of the elected positions. Now he could always claim once elected, however that's not a pressure position. He's got bodyguards and immunity from dt checks so there's no danger of dying if he's town, or being found out if he's scum. However by claiming mid day like this it instantly puts a HUGE amount of pressure on him. All eyes are on him at the moment and his every action is being scrutinized. This is an extremely tough position to be in as scum. And so it begs the question, if BC is scum, what is the motivation for claiming like this? He had a great chance at being elected so why mess that up as scum? With this claim BC is willingly taking the spotlight and the scrutiny. While he may be scum and have the biggest balls I've ever seen, I find it far more likely that he is doing his best to demonstrate his good intentions by willingly going on the hot seat. In conclusion, I can only think of town motives for claiming. currently MIA: L, now would be a good time to start posting. Things that are bad in a townie way: Palmar, I don't think you're scum but I'd appreciate if you put more effort into the game. Things that are bad in a scummy way: People calling Palmar scum. Palmar is making himself a really easy target with his blatantly bad posting, it doesn't take much to call someone who's posting like him out. It's people trying to score townie points by looking like they're standing up and acting town when in reality they're just going after something that costs them no skin off their back. Note this doesn't apply to people who have simply asked Palmar to play better (like me lol) I'm instead talking about the people who were like "zomfg lynch palmar." On January 14 2012 18:47 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: mkay wow a lot happened. I just wanna address the Mattchew candidacy. This is a tough call. On one hand, it is possible that mattchew is town. But the only evidence we have of this is foolishness's word, and with foolishness's actions so far I don't put too much stalk in it. For one, I find it really odd that foolishness would out a blue role just like that, he should know better than that. Another reason is that mattchew seems way too eager to claim confirmed town. At this point in the game it's impossible to know. There's a very real possibility that scum would mason foolishness to try and find out if he's on to them. Ultimately though, trying to determine mattchew's alignment comes down to WIFOM which could get endless. I would feel better about the whole mattchew thing if he took his position and tried to play protown with it however most of his posts since announcing his candidacy have been talking about how he is confirmed which he isn't. Anyway at this point I still feel pretty good about BC despite protact's analysis. Other people who are making sense atm are kita and to a lesser extent WBG. I disagree with WBG that Palmar is scum, I thought I knew what Palmar was trying to do with his bad posting but if he doesn't come in and capitalize on it within the next 12 hours or so I'll be more inclined to think he's scum. I would still love to see L post, I also want more out of GGQ who has done absolutely nothing so far, in terms of lynch I still feel very good about GGQ because I think he fits the lurking scum profile. He's been in the thread but his posts have not been protown and since I'm the only person who seriously called him out he's been able to slip into obscurity. There is no content in meapak's posts, unless he specifically prefaces his posts to do so. I'm pretty sure that's a little scum-habit, because I don't remember seeing any of this in responsibility, but he was a sub for chezinu. Why didn't we make foolishness mayor lol? | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 17 2012 11:42 Bill Murray wrote: 2 people who are masons are mafia together the sandroba lynch gives us a lot of information Bill, be reasonable, info lynching is a no-go, bro. Sandroba isn't scum. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 17 2012 11:59 Toadesstern wrote: you two say meapak is scum and you say GGQ is scum. Meapak wants GGQ to die. Something's wrong there unless meapak is know to do this. That's not a huge unless! Unless, it's huge! | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 17 2012 12:06 Bill Murray wrote: If you want to convince me about Macpo, you can call me the po-po, bro I read your post, and it screams town to me, why was I ever thinking you were scumatlarge this game? lol because you still might be scum I'm keeping my bill murray filter close at hand. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 17 2012 12:17 VisceraEyes wrote: This post seems to indicate that you think it's two...which is it, 1 or 2? Woah deja vu. This is the part where VE would suicide bomb into the person he is talking to. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
Try to balance between macpo and Jackal | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 14 2012 10:50 Jackal58 wrote: RPGs dude. You killed us. Your time will come... | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
##Vote: bill murray | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:02 VisceraEyes wrote: Probably because he knows Bill is gonna do what Bill wants and not what Protact wants. *shrug* I get that feeling from Bill and I've never played with the guy before. JACKAL IS BAUS BACK UP OFF JACKAL!!! HEY WOAH HEY WOAH HEY. Let jackal answer the question. I was pretty convinced he was mafia, and if this doesn't add up, I think it's fairly likely he might be scum. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:05 Jackal58 wrote: Because BM won't do anything he's asked to do. If a player is incinerated, and vigilante uses his shot on said person, does the bullet return? You are on thin ice. But for L to be actually killed would require a vigilante to use the same logic you do. And you would probably use that logic too. So for now I believe you. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:18 Jackal58 wrote: It's INCARCERATED Not incinerated. Not incarnated. I called my shot Bum. What do you have issues with? RPGs? no i thought you were very likely scum. Perhaps I need to review BC more closely. | ||
| ||