|
On January 14 2012 07:19 GGQ wrote: By the way, Palmar should not be given a free pass to post badly on day 1 so that he won't be killed night 1. That's just silly logic.
Should kenpachi be?
|
On January 14 2012 19:52 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 19:46 Palmar wrote:On January 14 2012 07:19 GGQ wrote: By the way, Palmar should not be given a free pass to post badly on day 1 so that he won't be killed night 1. That's just silly logic. Should kenpachi be? Palmar, you know you're playing bad, I know you're playing bad, WBG knows you're playing bad. Right now I think you were trying to see who jumped on you for your play. Gambit's over, it's time for you to be useful. And the fact that you compare yourself to kenpachi should really indicate that you've taken this little game as far as it's gonna run. Tell us what you learned by doing what you did.
Who cares, why am scummy for not posting and other people aren't.
Explain it.
|
Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum.
|
On January 14 2012 19:59 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 19:57 Palmar wrote: Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum. I don't explain shit to scum
Of course not, if you did it might actually come apparent that you don't have a case.
|
On January 14 2012 20:04 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 20:02 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On January 14 2012 19:59 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 14 2012 19:57 Palmar wrote: Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum. I don't explain shit to scum Explain it to me then. go read my filter in one word, meta.
So, knowing each game is a different game, and that meta is not valid unless it's applied very precisely (you can't say something like x has posted less than usual, what's important is how, why and what he has posted), you still think that you have a valid enough case?
Would you bet your abilities as a player on this case?
|
Cause I feel like it Kurumi.
|
Day 1 has two goals, getting someone I want in office, and killing someone I want to kill. Incog and Ciryandor fit the bill, my work is done here.
|
On January 14 2012 20:51 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 20:08 Palmar wrote:On January 14 2012 20:04 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 14 2012 20:02 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On January 14 2012 19:59 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 14 2012 19:57 Palmar wrote: Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum. I don't explain shit to scum Explain it to me then. go read my filter in one word, meta. So, knowing each game is a different game, and that meta is not valid unless it's applied very precisely (you can't say something like x has posted less than usual, what's important is how, why and what he has posted), you still think that you have a valid enough case? Would you bet your abilities as a player on this case? if I'm wrong about you being scum right now it reflects more on how bad your play is right now than mine. The fact that you are willing to try and guilt me into laying off you suggests you already know I'm town. Otherwise, you wouldn't ask whether I am willing to bet my abilities as a player on this case, since if I was scum I'd have no vested interest in something like that. So, that just strengthens my case even more. TL;DR, go die, scum.
No, because you don't have a case. My play is in no way, shape, or form bad. Take away the Palmar name, and you have someone you'd probably have a town read on. This means you're not reading the game objectively, and thus it's your play that's bad, not mine. If you remove meta from a case, it should still have some merit to it. Does yours?
The only possible way you're playing well right now, is if you're scum.
|
I'm still giving my support to Protactinium, I have no problem with him killing BC if only for how stupid regardless of BC's alignment his claim is.
|
Explain what in my play is scummy sandroba. Do it please.
|
@Sheth: No, you don't look scummy for defending me, mafia knows my alignment, but you could also simply have come to the correct conclusion. My current read on you is null, or maybe slightly leaning town
There is no real benefit in the mason thing, as the role is almost completely irrelevant this game, seeing as both sides have access to it. There is no con other than discussion about it taking up space and thought power that can be put to better use. I've basically decided to ignore the claims. I do however find it weird people are claiming on day 1.
I think this game is infested with masons and jacks, and I think the sooner we realize this, the sooner we can actually start getting something done.
I think Ciryandor may have screwed up in his very first post. Of all the things in that post what struck me as odd was the speculation if sandroba and I were going to run, just the way it was worded and in the context of his post, it feels like a very insecure statement.
I also think BC is a good lynch, because his claim is strictly bad. However, there also exists a scenario where BC believes he's doing something good, when he isn't, and it doesn't make him scum. I'm not sure.
Of other people I think VE should be treated as town if CC flips. As scum he'd have used his tunnel on me as an excuse to shoot me, I think. I'm on the fence about bugs. I think Refallen is very townie (or Cwave now). Meapak already looks like town. Kenpachi deserves a bullet, as usual.
|
On January 15 2012 06:20 Palmar wrote: I think this game is infested with masons and jacks, and I think the sooner we realize this, the sooner we can actually start getting something done.
What I meant to say is "and I think the sooner we realize this is irrelevant, the sooner we can actually start getting something done".
|
I also don't like sandroba at the moment.
|
On January 15 2012 06:23 L wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2012 06:17 VisceraEyes wrote: Seriously guys this is all hands on deck. I'm very town and I'm very Jack. I need to be mayor.
VOTES ON VE GOGOGO
This isn't me trying to leverage my role to win the election - if I wanted to do that I would have done that already and not called BC out on it right after his claim. This is me trying to keep one of our most powerful roles IN THE GAME. I'm not going to do anymore stupid shit if you elect me.
I'll vote for you if you figure out a snazzy plan to confirm that you aren't bullshitting about your role.
His role is completely irrelevant... He's probably town just based on the effort and attitude he has.
|
I'm off for a while, I'm tentatively voicing interest in getting VisceraEyes into a good position, even if he's terrible he's at least looking town.
It's nice to have townies in positions. I would actually like a Protact/VE combo in office.
|
On January 15 2012 06:27 VisceraEyes wrote: I herped HARD.
Business as usual.
|
So, it's 1 am my time now.
WBG, I think you're town, however, you're playing terribly. You don't have a case on me, you've never written one up. If you remove meta from your case you're literally stuck with nothing.
I suggest we put visceraeyes and protactinium in the office. I would prefer a BC or Cyri lynch, maybe even sandroba.
Anyone who's town and voting for someone that intends to lynch me, needs to take a look at what they're doing, because I'm not the one playing badly, I've simply posted less than usual. There is nothing you have on me expect meta, thus the case is completely invalid, and when I flip town, you will have proven yourselves to be really dumb and bad.
It's one thing voting for a bad case, but voting for a non-existant one?
Anyway, make the right decision, nighty.
|
On January 15 2012 12:00 supersoft wrote: VOTE BC GUYS!!! ASAP!!!
inognito shouldn't be mayor!!! macpep or whatever his lynchtarget is called is a horrible kill. Palmar is the one and only good case right now.
What's good about it (why am I awake at 3am?)
|
For someone who argues constantly that meta is useless, that lynch is terrible bloodycobbler. I have repeatedly asked people to present accusations that aren't meta, and no one has provided any.
Thus it's strictly dumb to lynch me.... whatever.
|
On January 15 2012 12:10 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2012 12:07 Palmar wrote:On January 15 2012 12:00 supersoft wrote: VOTE BC GUYS!!! ASAP!!!
inognito shouldn't be mayor!!! macpep or whatever his lynchtarget is called is a horrible kill. Palmar is the one and only good case right now. What's good about it (why am I awake at 3am?) LOL AND HE SHOWS HIS FACE LOLOLOLOL
If you're town, you're now degraded to completely useless and terrible. But you're probably scum because no one is this bad.
|
|
|
|