|
Personalities Jackal: L Kurumi: BM Pandain: Qatol Kavdragon: Chezinu Sandaroba: Ver kenpachi: RoL Foolishness: Bumatlarge Curu: Foolishness LSB: Ace VisceraEyes: Coagulation bumatlarge: Incognito Curu: Foolishness youngmini: Kenpachi deconduo: jimbosilvers
Nice rolefishing @ BC there, I'll reveal my role after I use my power, not bloody well until then. Should be obvious at this point though (although maybe not! I'm probably doing a very bad impression) (hint: don't waste time on this)
|
Personalities Jackal: L Kurumi: BM Pandain: Qatol Kavdragon: Chezinu Sandaroba: Ver kenpachi: RoL Foolishness: Bumatlarge Curu: Foolishness LSB: Ace VisceraEyes: Coagulation bumatlarge: Incognito Curu: Foolishness youngmini: Kenpachi deconduo: jimbosilvers tnkted: SHOWTIME!
Fine, there I am. Happy? Scamp called it day1 (gw btw scamp lol I didn't realize Showtime! was so distinctive). I have no idea how you wouldn't be able to figure this out since multiple other people managed to without much trouble.
And the reason for the list being incomplete is because
1) I don't know all of the players on that list, I don't recognize them immediately despite having read the beast of a thread that is the TL quiz. You can't accuse me for being scummy because I haven't played as long as you 2) I'm bad at remembering things like this. I'm doing the best I can; me being incompetent is a bad reason to call me scum.
So good work, personality sniffer, you've sniffed out another one.
|
On August 19 2011 12:10 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2011 12:08 tnkted wrote: Personalities Jackal: L Kurumi: BM Pandain: Qatol Kavdragon: Chezinu Sandaroba: Ver kenpachi: RoL Foolishness: Bumatlarge Curu: Foolishness LSB: Ace VisceraEyes: Coagulation bumatlarge: Incognito Curu: Foolishness youngmini: Kenpachi deconduo: jimbosilvers tnkted: SHOWTIME!
Fine, there I am. Happy? Scamp called it day1 (gw btw scamp lol I didn't realize Showtime! was so distinctive). I have no idea how you wouldn't be able to figure this out since multiple other people managed to without much trouble.
And the reason for the list being incomplete is because
1) I don't know all of the players on that list, I don't recognize them immediately despite having read the beast of a thread that is the TL quiz. You can't accuse me for being scummy because I haven't played as long as you 2) I'm bad at remembering things like this. I'm doing the best I can; me being incompetent is a bad reason to call me scum.
So good work, personality sniffer, you've sniffed out another one. why do you keep posting it though it serves no purpose.
No comment
|
So, who shot last night? I'm guessing they shot LSB.
|
oh wait, modkill im an idiot
|
On August 19 2011 13:45 redFF wrote: if i was in tntked's position i would post random obviously wrong personality lists because they only help scum.
Am I really getting simultaneously accused of keeping a too accurate personality list and a too inaccurate personality list?! Pick one guys, you can't have both.
Personalities Jackal: L Kurumi: BM Pandain: Qatol Kavdragon: Chezinu Sandaroba: Ver kenpachi: RoL Foolishness: Bumatlarge Curu: BC LSB: Ace VisceraEyes: Coagulation bumatlarge: Incognito youngmini: Kenpachi deconduo: jimbosilvers tnkted: SHOWTIME! Palmar: Flamewheel
I'm hopping on the Palmar wagon.
|
|
On August 19 2011 20:31 Palmar wrote: ##Vote Curu
On August 19 2011 22:13 sandroba wrote: ##Vote: Curu
Yep, I'm convinced they're both scum now.
|
Personalities Jackal: L Kurumi: BM Pandain: Qatol Kavdragon: Chezinu Sandaroba: Ver kenpachi: RoL Foolishness: Bumatlarge Curu: Foolishness LSB: Ace VisceraEyes: Coagulation bumatlarge: Incognito youngmini: Kenpachi deconduo: jimbosilvers tnkted: SHOWTIME! Palmar: Flamewheel
Sorry, misread. I actually had you in the list as two people before, lol
|
On August 19 2011 23:05 Curu wrote: I'm going to have to rethink sandroba though, scumdroba wouldn't be this stupid.
This is what I was thinking too, until he voted you. Now I don't know.
|
On August 19 2011 23:54 Curu wrote: I retract my statement for now to ban sandroba btw.
tnkted why did you follow me so readily into the sandroba case then back off immediately too?
At first it made sense, and it seemed confirmed by his vote. I still actually think he's scummy due to that vote, but his explanation of how he misunderstood your role seems legit.
You changed your mind just as quickly as I did, don't you accuse me of being flip floppy. I'm learning all of this second hand, you will forgive me for having to reevaluate the data every now and then.
|
On August 20 2011 03:00 VisceraEyes wrote: What are the chances that Curu is the one that is lying? There's no evidence that says he's being truthful except for a dead body...and the dead body was there before Curu's claim. Isn't it just as likely that Curu is the one that's lying about tracking Palmar?
If Curu is lying, we'd find that out the instant Palmar died. Are you suggesting that Curu is exposing himself as mafia just to net ONE town kill?
I wasn't on the lynch VE wagon before, but comments like this make me seriously suspicious.
|
On August 20 2011 03:12 kitaman27 wrote: One of the biggest hits to town morale is a successful red check. As the town already has identified the lynch target, it completely shuts down discussion for 48 hours. As a proven scumhunterkitaman, it is clear to me that we need to continue to generate activity.
This is the only part of kita's huge mayoral post I have any interest in. It's obviously part of kita's role to try to guide the town a bit, but his last idea went absolutely nowhere and I have no interest in a mayoral campaign at this point, especially when there is a list of people 'allowed' to be candidates, picked by someone we aren't even sure is town.
But this little piece is good advice. We need to keep up the discussion and conversation. So......
Scumread time! Everyone list the top 5 players that are currently leading your scumdar.
1. Palmar/Curu 2. Ghrur 3. VE 4. Node? 5. Scamp? 6. Pandain? (I think he's out of banhammers, and lied when he said he had infinite)
PS: I think Kitaman is GMarshal
|
On August 20 2011 03:36 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2011 03:34 Pandain wrote:On August 20 2011 03:12 kitaman27 wrote: . If your name is not included, its probably because you are bad.
Eligible Candidates: Not Pandain
-.- I'm always open to bribery. Also, I'm getting a clear anti-town feeling from those ignoring my plan.
LOL
4 of the people on your list don't even have a page worth of posts in this thread yet.
|
On August 20 2011 03:39 Palmar wrote: I'm claiming mafia.
I take it you have a message for us from the scumteam then?
|
You drive a mercury milan?
What, are you a lesbian or something?
|
On August 20 2011 06:04 Jackal58 wrote: I probably won't be back until tomorrow morning. If I do post again tonight there is a good chance it will be incoherent.
This.
Its friday, I'm going to band practice then to a party then to sleep etc. Curu is right; I haven't been posting analysis and I should have. In my defence I've been posting most of my stuff at work, where I don't have time to comb the thread all that much, which you need to do analysis.
I will do an analysis of ghrur tomorrow when I have time.
|
On August 20 2011 06:14 Curu wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2011 06:13 tnkted wrote:On August 20 2011 06:04 Jackal58 wrote: I probably won't be back until tomorrow morning. If I do post again tonight there is a good chance it will be incoherent. This. Its friday, I'm going to band practice then to a party then to sleep etc. Curu is right; I haven't been posting analysis and I should have. In my defence I've been posting most of my stuff at work, where I don't have time to comb the thread all that much, which you need to do analysis. I will do an analysis of ghrur tomorrow when I have time. You said you thought ghrur wasn't actually scum in your last relevant post, nothing has changed since then. So why your sudden change in read?
Are you serious? My 'last relevant post'?
Come at me bro, you've been riding my ass for like four pages now. I don't have to update the thread to satisfy you about my reads every time I change my mind about something. Chill the fuck out. I'll explain my reasoning tomorrow.
I'm outie for tonight, GL with the lynch yall.
|
Ok I usually start these posts by assuming that my target is mafia; then I go through their posts and read them all for content related to that. This isn't a very good approach for everyone because it means that a analyst who isn't being very careful can find things that aren't scummy and call them scummy (leading to a bad analysis) but I've been doing it long enough that I think I can do it without prejudice.
Ghrur Analysis
Fact 1: Ghrur has been buddying WHILE he accuses me of buddying. Nobody has bothered accusing him of buddying.
On August 18 2011 12:01 ghrur wrote: Oh Curu, that makes me remember, tnkted said our town atmosphere was lively too. :D What scum.
On August 19 2011 10:17 ghrur wrote:Couldn't agree more right now.
On August 18 2011 02:45 ghrur wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2011 02:26 Curu wrote:On August 18 2011 02:19 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I am going to tell you all right now, both are bad lynches and a no lynch would be preferable. On that note, I will be voting for someone random right now. So you somehow know the results of every lynch (today and yesterday), while contributing nothing to suggest a better target or anything? Can we lynch RoL instead? Yeah RoL, where did you're Show nested quote +On August 16 2011 13:10 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:On August 16 2011 13:09 ghrur wrote: My statement wasn't "guilt." It was a "whatever." Btw, I vigied Kurumi so we wouldn't have a spamfest anymore. I fucking love you. I can now start actually contributing. I am heading to sleep, but I will catch up tomorrow and apply rape where necessary. "actually contributing" go?
Fact 2: D1, Rather than shoot somebody he thought was mafia (me) he decided to shoot a nearly confirmed townie. Then he claimed that he did it because Kurumi was spamming.
And thats......... basically all I could find that was scummy in his behavior. Conclusion: Ghrur is town. Sorry for doubting you, buddy.
Overall Ghrur's play seems to be extremely aggressive; he's an analytic redFF1. However, much of his reasoning is faulty; he's spending time thinking about his lynches but doesn't ever find conclusive evidence. Instead, he's applying pressure and hoping his target slips up during his defence. It's an interesting strategy, one that I've seen DrH pull off a few times. DrH tends to get lynched though, so we should probably avoid lynching ghrur even if his behavior feels scummy.
Some advice: Your style of posting is very obnoxious to be accused with, which is good because it encourages people to post and respond, but it also builds up a bad atmosphere for town. What happens when you accuse somebody who is town, tunnel them for days, and then get them lynched? You've wasted days of tunnelling that could have been spent on scum if you'd only mentally put that person back into the 'ok, that was a legit defense'. That's a tough mental maneuver to do; part of being good at it is understanding when somebody has a legit defence. Generally you're looking for defensiveness, topic changing, buddying, and sometimes, bandwagoning. Also look for wishy washy defenses that rely on you giving them benefit of the doubt.
Now I have a big ol- pounding headache (anyone else from the st. paul area? you know the wild onion? Yeah) and I'm going to go shower and play some mindless video game for a few hours (cortex command anyone? :D). I don't want to think right now. Later, when I'm feeling less hungover, I want to post an analysis of youngmini and one of curu (who, btw i think is town, but it's good to check these things).
|
On August 20 2011 10:33 flamewheel wrote: It's Friday and I've got to get down.
I apologize for my inactivity, though this is just simply not a period where I have much free time. Still though, here's something that should make the coming days more interesting.
I lied when I said I had something for Day 3--that was simply me trying to draw a hit. Well, it worked. I was shot last night and lost my extra life. But now I have additional powers to make up for my new-found vulnerability.
I believe Palmar is scum, but I don't think sandroba is scum with him. Look at the earlier part of the day, where Palmar and sandroba are being linked together. Comrade Palmar decides to try to link himself together with sandroba but that doesn't work--so instead he's just trolling now. I don't have time to look more carefully into it, but it definitely seems at this point that Mafia have decided to bus him and planned on it early, considering that there are still 24 hours left to go.
Wait, you were shot?
So what vig shot last night?!
|
|
|
|