World at War 2 Mafia - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
| ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 06 2011 11:50 sandroba wrote: I like that no one comented ON MY HUGE FUCKING CASE on palmar that proves he is scum, then vote for me for something I already explained. First of all you are calling that scum slip (it's a mistake btw, based on previous games knowledge) before we even know how many fucking kp mafia actually has. Good job. Also anyone that agreed to my plan should be voting to lynch palmar regardless since he broke the no nukes rule, shorttened the day and possibly took away an extra life from another player for no reason. He didn't even follow his own plan. God knows if he has nukes or not. Use your head and vote for palmar. He is 100% scum. At the moment I'm not completely sure he is scum. He did break the rules we had outlined and nuked for no reason though. My idea of nuke policy has changed after reading through N0 more closely, and while Palmar's stance is iffy, I'm debating between him being an outspoken townie with misplaced ideals and mafia/conspirator. So for breaking teh rulez: ##Unvote: sandroba ##Vote: Palmar | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 06 2011 11:55 sinani206 wrote: What does everyone else think of my accusation on sandroba and Curu? Weak. I can see the argument against sandroba, but he has been very pro-town besides it, and provided a reasonable explanation for it. Further, as GM said if he is scum he is being vocal enough that some mild scrutiny will reveal his alignment. Your case against Curu is pithy. There's nothing behind it. You're accusing him of being scum for calling out what could be a potential scum slip | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
GMarshal and Palmar - I am handing you the task of helping me keep everyone focused and on track, and developing a pro-town atmosphere. We managed it fairly well in RTM, so we should be able to do it again here. You guys can be extremely pro-town when you want to be, so let's use that to our advantage and get things running smoothly here again. Here is how we will create a pro-town atmosphere: 1. We will all be respectful to each other. There is absolutely zero point in getting worked up over something. We've all done it at some point, but it's a bad idea for two reasons - there's a person behind those words, and it doesn't further our goal as town at all. 2. If you wish to accuse someone, create a formal FoS. Clearly state who you are accusing, explain why you think they are scum, and provide evidence in the form of quoted posts with an explanation of how those posts show they are scum. If need be I can make a template for this too. 3. Don't nuke just for the hell of it. Don't nuke unless your target is agreed upon by the town. If a rogue nuker nukes you, don't nuke back. Lynch them. If you've been pro-town enough, you can call for an anti-nuke and if the town agrees you're saved. 4. If you see the thread starting to get off track again, remind everyone of their goal. Nudge it back on topic and try to calm down any hotheads who are keeping it messy. My thoughts on a few players: Mataza - This is really unfortunate. I was going to suggest that you be the one to use your nukes on our first lynch target, since you softclaimed having nukes that wouldn't raise the radiation level. However, you broke our nuke policy, and as such you must now be lynched. ##Vote: Mataza Palmar - I'm not sold on this guy being scum. He's way too vocal and outspoken about his opinions, which in my experience leads to a townie more often than it leads to mafia (or conspirator in this case). I would not be okay with a lynch on him today, especially over Mataza. I want to see more of his posts before I commit to calling him scum. Sandroba - He is probably one of the worst targets for a nuke today. He has been active and very pro-town. It is his idea for nuke policy that we took, and it definitely benefits us. If he flips mafia or conspirator, I will be surprised. With that said, I wouldn't recommend anybody anti-nuke. We can't guarantee his alignment (especially with the possible scum slip) and those will be best saved for Day 3 and onwards if/when the Axis try to launch an attack on us. sinani206 - Again, I don't think he is a very good lynch target. He's being outspoken, and isn't giving me a scum vibe. I think he just got stuck on a bad suspect and started tunneling it. I would also be surprised if he flips scum. | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 06 2011 23:32 syllogism wrote: So chaos13 who do you think has been scummy so far because there's a distinct lack of any finger pointing by you so far, which is quite unlike your usual play as far as I can tell heist would be my biggest suspect. He's been noncommittal and asking questions without providing anything new. GMarshal is my second. He hasn't quite got his usual leaders hat on and some of his ideas regarding nukes have been contradictory or strange. Someone to keep an eye on there. My style is definitely going to be a little different this game. I'm busy, and I'm trying out a new format for taking notes, one that is far more detailed. I'm only on page 12 at the moment and working my way through them. | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 06 2011 23:47 TheAwesomeAll wrote: Chaos your just announcing that the guy you voted on is probably not mafia, and find it sad that you HAVE to hop on the bandwagon. You already commited to calling him scum with your vote, but now there is a path with even less resistance and you just hop there. Not on my watch, ##Unvote: Mataza ##Vote: Chaos13 There is absolutely no point in having a nuke policy if we don't enforce it. | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
| ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
| ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 07 2011 03:03 youngminii wrote: are you kidding me let me make it clear for you people who seem to think it's wise to lynch me I just spent two anti-nukes and a nuke cleaning up the mess Mataza started and directly supporting the plan you are all 'following'. tell me HOW in Caller's name that's interpreted as scummy? Are you starting to see why we lynch rather than counter-nuke? | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 07 2011 03:05 youngminii wrote: the WRL stayed the same i did you all a favour and you want to lynch me this doesn't even make sense, this town is terrible Rather than wasting a nuke and two anti-nukes, you could have voted to lynch Mataza and used one of your anti-nukes. We would have seen the same result without using as many of our resources. | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 07 2011 03:08 TheAwesomeAll wrote: Chaos13 seems scum to me, dont blaim the entire town for what a few scumbuddies are telling each other. Your tunneling is really starting to get on my nerves. If you think I'm scum, actually build a case and prove how. What you're doing right now is spamming up the thread and creating an anti-town environment. You're not doing a thing to help us out at the moment. | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 07 2011 03:10 sandroba wrote: YM is town. Possibly mataza too. GMarshal is scum. No one is following the supposed policy and my patience has worn out. Don't fire any nukes at me cuz I'm fucking imortal. If they do, don't shoot them down, cuz it's not worth it just for the radiation at this point. ##Nuke GMarshal FUUUUUUUUUUUUU- This is ridiculous. How hard is it to understand the idea of DO NOT NUKE | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
Do you want to learn how to derp like a pro? Do you want to be on the same level of derpiness as our politicians and beloved leaders? Here's your chance! Join World at War 2 Mafia and find out what YOU can do with nuclear weapons! Conspirator who wins with radiation? No problem - nuke anyway! Axis who is trying to destroy you and cause a mess? No problem - nuke anyway! Join now and get a free gift of a nuke, so when one comes whistling down on your town, you can fire one right back and destroy the world! Yay! Warning: May cause a derp overload, resulting in being nuked. | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 07 2011 03:19 TheAwesomeAll wrote: EVERYONE CALM THE FUCK DOWN By now you should know that we are not all flying super vigilantes. we GOT TO GET OUR SHIT TOGETHER. Stop nuking, everyone who casts a nuke from now on will get nuked themselves. If GM is scum we will vote for him and just barely lynch him. Then we he flips red we can see who didnt vote for him, Nuking is extremely anti town If he turns green can examine who voted for him and why they voted. I will nuke the next guy who is going to nuke, if they dont have a town majority. No hesitation, no thinking just 2 bolded words Now lets play this as a no nuke game, nukes are only used to kill the guy who nukes, mutual destruction and a normal mafia game. So a while ago you encouraged a nuke. Now you're against nuking. But you'll nuke if someone else does. But nuking is anti-town. Nukes are only used to kill nukers? But then wouldn't the nukers who nuke the nukers then be nuked nukers, meaning we have endless nukes nuking nukers? | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 07 2011 03:21 Kurumi wrote: Hey guys, I thought Operation Watchtower is the worst fucking thing You could imagine? Can we change our vote for campaign? | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
##Vote: TheAwesomeAll | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 07 2011 03:28 GMarshal wrote: So, I'm fucked don't bother discussing me, TAA, considering making you my nuke target, have to think about it... Pick a lurker. I suggest heist or deconduo, cause they're flying way under the radar. I want to lynch TAA today. | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 07 2011 05:29 Coagulation wrote: town sure shit the bed in this one. I couldn't agree more. You scum or conspirator? Oh and OpZ either feels the need to share his private life with us or he has a hilarious posting restriction. But seriously, I leave for an hour and come back to find another (2,3?) nukes launched and an even bigger derpfest than before. This is ridiculous. | ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
| ||
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 07 2011 07:21 Palmar wrote: But I only wish well. I don't condone violence, but someone should probably nuke that Drazerk guy Yeah, and there's probably a couple others we should nuke, eh? Cause they're scummy, right? Not cause you're a Conspirator or anything. | ||
| ||