I can only begging to imagine those fat producers back at WB and universal and sony laughing their asses off walking to the bank thinking they made another shitty movie and it sold very well.

Can't these people make an original movie at least once every year? Stop doing fucking sequels god damn it.

The matrix was good then they fucked it all up with huge dragonball Z esque fighting on the 3rd movie.

Spiderman was good until they made peter parker fucking emo

Just fucking stop. If they are not gonna put any effort and just pretty everything up with CGI then I'm not paying to see their stankin movies

Waxangel

United States33347 Posts

November 26 2007 06:14 GMT

#22

Horrid movie.

The dialog is downright AWFUL. Good actors can't salvage an unbearably bad script. CG is okay, still very obvious it is CG though. Motion is still off at parts, even if they did use motion capture. Decent plot, but it's paced horribly with poor storytelling. List would get long if I went into more detail, I'll leave it at that.

tiffany

3664 Posts

November 26 2007 06:20 GMT

#23

On November 26 2007 15:13 Rev0lution wrote:
I can only begging to imagine those fat producers back at WB and universal and sony laughing their asses off walking to the bank thinking they made another shitty movie and it sold very well.

Can't these people make an original movie at least once every year? Stop doing fucking sequels god damn it.

The matrix was good then they fucked it all up with huge dragonball Z esque fighting on the 3rd movie.

Spiderman was good until they made peter parker fucking emo

Just fucking stop. If they are not gonna put any effort and just pretty everything up with CGI then I'm not paying to see their stankin movies

you're right on most accounts, except i don't think this movie was made by a big production company. i could be wrong though. also, beowulf isn't a sequel, but i think i get what you mean.

another shortcoming that hasn't been mentioned yet was the dissonant wailing; had to cover my ears every single time

geometryb

United States1249 Posts

November 26 2007 07:08 GMT

#24

watching it in 3d was pretty cool

citrus

United States158 Posts

November 26 2007 07:27 GMT

#25

I heard it sucked badly. The only salvation being a hot, nude, CGI Angelina Jolie.

I never enjoyed the story anyways.

HaXxorIzed

Australia8434 Posts

November 26 2007 09:01 GMT

#26

On November 26 2007 15:14 Waxangel wrote:
Horrid movie.

The dialog is downright AWFUL. Good actors can't salvage an unbearably bad script. CG is okay, still very obvious it is CG though. Motion is still off at parts, even if they did use motion capture. Decent plot, but it's paced horribly with poor storytelling. List would get long if I went into more detail, I'll leave it at that.

Exactly. It's difficult to appreciateany of the CG or eye candy when you're forced to wince at the utter absurdity of the poor script. Another perfect example of why a terrible script and poor execution can do to a movie.

Snet

United States3573 Posts

November 26 2007 15:51 GMT

#27

I'm sad because the online versions are really bad quality so I can't see the movie yet.

DTDominion

United States2148 Posts

November 26 2007 15:58 GMT

#28

On November 26 2007 15:13 Rev0lution wrote:
The matrix was good then they fucked it all up with huge dragonball Z esque fighting on the 3rd movie.

That was one of the only good parts of those movies.

Pinselstrich

43 Posts

November 26 2007 16:44 GMT

#29

I actually watched it in 3-d and some parts very pretty nice made. But apart of the effects (the dragon was just awesome) and hothothot 3-d Angelina I found the movie really stupid and boring. Since I read the real Beowulf saga and knew what it's about I was like "WTF???" the whole time, cause they changed most of the story basically...

There's another Beowulf movie that recently came out, called "Beowulf and Grendel"... that one is better if you ask me, because it's a lot more real and authentic.

Rev0lution

United States1805 Posts

November 26 2007 17:06 GMT

#30

On November 27 2007 00:58 DTDominion wrote:

Show nested quote +

That was one of the only good parts of those movies.

I meant the third movie when neo and the detective go super saiyan on each other..

No_eL

Chile1438 Posts

November 26 2007 17:10 GMT

#31

and how about the 3D graphics.. its true you need special glasses to view the 3D effects?? or its just a digital movie.. like a normal pc game??

uiCk

Canada1925 Posts

November 26 2007 17:36 GMT

#32

maybe stop paying for shitty movies and they will stop making them? pirate the movie if your really curious, dont give these fuckers any penny.

go piracy!

Eti307

Canada3442 Posts

November 26 2007 17:42 GMT

#33

Average movie on it's own.

But I saw it in IMAX 3D and it's great. First movie I see completely in 3D for the whole duration. If you plan on seeing this movie, go see it in 3D. If you don't have any 3D cinema near you, don't go and wait for the dvd I guess

uiCk

Canada1925 Posts

November 26 2007 17:44 GMT

#34

or download it instead of buying dvd/renting it

KarlSberg~

731 Posts

November 26 2007 17:52 GMT

#35

The scenario looks like it has been written for (by?) 10 year olds.
Except for all the sexual trash talk, blood geysers and decapitations.

Undoubtly the worst movie I saw this year.

Liquid`Nazgul

22427 Posts

November 26 2007 18:10 GMT

#36

i thought this was absolutely terrible

NerO

United States2071 Posts

November 26 2007 18:14 GMT

#37

the movie was fucking horrrible

Redcloak

United States530 Posts

November 26 2007 18:29 GMT

#38

I really hate the use of CGI. Looks like a damn game (and not in a good way).

You're some kind of special liar.

This movie has fantastic animation, the only parts that really were flawed were the horses... the running just looked wrong. The rest of the animation was superb, and some of the parts were actually the best I've seen in this style.

The movie itself isn't anything special, but it's an enjoyable watch in IMAX 3D.

Zeller

United States1109 Posts

November 26 2007 18:31 GMT

#39

3D stuff was cool , story was boring , i just wanted an action 3D movie not some lameass story , i dont get attached or feel anything for animated characters

hrmM

United States210 Posts

November 26 2007 19:02 GMT

#40

CG i thought was very good, but it deviated from the books storyline and it felt like they dragged on at times. I'd say the only thing worth it were those $12 3D glasses I got >_>