| Blogs > RyuChus |
|
RyuChus
Canada442 Posts
So if a cat, always lands on it's 4 feet, and buttered toast always lands on the buttered side, then that means, if you strap buttered toast onto a cat, pick it up and drop it, it will spin forever and forever stuck in a loop! I get paid 7000 dollars an hour to say "moo". I'll find more of these later. For now, good night, seeya tomorrow!   | ||
|
RedLuck
Canada253 Posts
| ||
|
mOnion
United States5657 Posts
On October 06 2010 13:52 RyuChus wrote: I get paid 7000 dollars an hour to say "moo" i'll bite. what? | ||
|
Meta
United States6228 Posts
Assuming it takes one second to say moo, that's the equivalent of getting paid almost $2 for saying it once. Either that or he's a liar. | ||
|
RyuChus
Canada442 Posts
 glad to see people randomly puzzled. | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.snarfle.com/images/anti-gravity_cat.gif) | ||
|
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
As such, any landing result of the merged objects would not contradict the original statements. The cat could land on its feet with the bread strapped to its back, the butter could land on butter side with the cat upside down, or something else entirely could happen (cat/bread land on sides). | ||
|
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
| ||
|
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
On October 06 2010 14:36 Lemonwalrus wrote: AcrossFiveJulys after I read the OP i thought, "There is no way this thread can get less funny", but I'll be damned, you proved me wrong. look bro just cuz you dont like logic dosnt mean u need to be trollin my shit. lemonwalrus psh dat account name dosnt even make any cence i cant belive how much of a noob u are. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On October 06 2010 14:30 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: Assuming the original statements are true (that bread&butter lands on butter side, cat lands on four feet) merging the bread&butter and cat objects results in a new object, whose landing properties are not specified, since the "strap butter to cat" operation has not been properly defined in terms of the propagation of the arguments' landing properties. As such, any landing result of the merged objects would not contradict the original statements. The cat could land on its feet with the bread strapped to its back, the butter could land on butter side with the cat upside down, or something else entirely could happen (cat/bread land on sides). yeah, well what if u take slices of buttered toast, and turn them into mitts for the cat with the butter on the inside then drop the cat | ||
|
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
On October 06 2010 14:45 travis wrote: yeah, well what if u take slices of buttered toast, and turn them into mitts for the cat with the butter on the inside then drop the cat Ah, but you've missed the point. You haven't specified what the landing properties of the breadmittoncat are (like was specified for the bread&butter alone and for the cat alone), so no matter how the breadmittoncat lands it will not violate the original statements. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
|
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
A breadmitton cat got dropped right on down And I'd like to take a minute Just sit right there I'll tell you how breadmitton cat lands however he please In west Philadelphia born and raised In the alleys was where breadmitton cat spent most of his days Chillin' out maxin' relaxin' all cool And all sipping some milk outside the pool When a couple of dogs Who were up to no good Startin making trouble in his neighborhood He got in one little fight and his owner got scared She said 'You're goin' to the pound you ain't breathin' my air' He meowed and pleaded with her the whole car ride there And finally, she said 'oy vay!' She opened the car window and let him fly. breadmitton's life was flashing before his eyes. he's flying into a buttered bread factory, yo this is bad he was goin so fast he flew right through the glass. But holy shit, he's still alive? He lands on some bread, hmmmmm this might be alright. But this isn't how breadmitton became all that Sure, bread on his feet, he's one cool cat But somethins missin I'll get to it next I hope you don't get too perplexed Well uh, after breadmitton cat landed and when he came out There was a dude in a robe who looked like a nerd standing there all cracked out He ain't trying to do nothin, He's just standing there! Then all of a sudden he pulled out a wand and chanted 'butter feet' He whistled and whined, and breadmitton cat rose 100 feet into the air he felt the bread on his feet get all buttery And thought "I'm safe, I'll always land on my feet and bread will always land on the butter" The nerd in the cape grinned, and levitated breadmitton another seven or eight And yelled to breadmitton ''Yo homes smell ya later' breadmitton fell to the ground landing on his back He was finally there To sit on his throne as a cool pile of blood splattered on the ground... ... because even though the bread would individually have to land on the buttered side and the cat would have to land on his feet, nothing is said about what a combination of buttered bread and cat would have to do, so any scenario is valid unless you make assumptions about the landing properties of breadmitton cat. | ||
|
Loser777
1931 Posts
| ||
|
Necosarius
Sweden4042 Posts
| ||
|
NeoLearner
Belgium1847 Posts
On October 06 2010 15:52 Loser777 wrote: The cat and butter exist in a quantum state where they land on BOTH the buttered side/feet Yes, but once you actually look, you disturb that system and one single state will be chosen. So you, as the observer, choose whether the cat falls on it's back or not. So logically this experiment is the same as actually throwing the cat into the ground yourself. Cat molester! | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
Mixu vs TBD
Spirit vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
Patches Events
OSC
Afreeca Starleague
Soma vs Shuttle
BeSt vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
Monday Night Weeklies
Afreeca Starleague
Leta vs ggaemo
Jaedong vs Queen
GSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
